Seton Hall
Men - Women
2011 - 2012 - 2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,684  Jared Hanko SR 34:44
2,377  Ryan Flannery FR 35:52
2,711  Carl Johnston JR 36:46
2,827  Tyler Orner SO 37:16
2,915  Jacob Best FR 37:42
2,924  Cory Hellwig SR 37:46
3,191  joseph martinelli FR 40:06
3,192  Tony Cramond SR 40:06
National Rank #266 of 311
Mid-Atlantic Region Rank #27 of 34
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 27th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Jared Hanko Ryan Flannery Carl Johnston Tyler Orner Jacob Best Cory Hellwig joseph martinelli Tony Cramond
Metropolitan Conference Championships 10/05 1421 34:37 36:26 35:43 37:57 37:25 38:08 38:14 41:28
Leopard Invitational 10/13 1392 34:32 36:02 35:51 37:03 37:45 37:21 40:05 39:10
Big East Championships 10/26 1467 35:01 35:55 37:35 37:49 38:18 38:07 43:02 41:02
Mid-Atlantic Region 11/09 1406 34:51 35:04 38:38 36:27 37:32 37:35 39:18





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 27.3 852 0.7 3.8 14.4 44.4 25.7 8.6 2.2 0.1



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Jared Hanko 120.0
Ryan Flannery 156.6
Carl Johnston 183.6
Tyler Orner 191.9
Jacob Best 196.3
Cory Hellwig 196.8
joseph martinelli 212.7




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 0.7% 0.7 24
25 3.8% 3.8 25
26 14.4% 14.4 26
27 44.4% 44.4 27
28 25.7% 25.7 28
29 8.6% 8.6 29
30 2.2% 2.2 30
31 0.1% 0.1 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0